Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016-02-23 15-53-48 paris.jpg

File:2016-02-23 15-53-48 paris.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2016 at 09:11:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2016-02-23 15-53-48 paris.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016-02-23 15-53-48 paris.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
•  Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 09:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 09:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
• Respectfully  Opposed like the other one, by comparison with this photo, although I would want that one to have perspective correction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose QI but not FP. Much as the other one, and not as sharp. (the image has no embedded colourspace and the filename is unhelpful). -- Colin (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral as these two images are very similar and I think we should decide to consider one or the other but not both. Daniel Case (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Very similar ? Are you kidding ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes ... they're both nestled stone arches. I really think they should have been nominated together, or not at all. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Actually, they are very different and tell very different stories... And nominating the two as a set is a non sense : there are three existing portals, one is missing.--Jebulon (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Colin. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Poco² 15:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)