Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Ostrawa, Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 02.jpg

File:2014 Ostrawa, Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2015 at 10:34:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Ostrawa, Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Ostrawa, Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info all by Halavar - nominated by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Halavar (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice church! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support The quality isn't outstanding but the composition is very good --LivioAndronico talk 11:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks a bit hazy. Raise the contrast maybe? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

   Done Version with more contrast uploaded. Hope it's better now:) --Halavar (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

  Perhaps I should have been more emphatic - it could still use more contrast. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support D kuba (talk) 11:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not eye-catching enough for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support One of these pictures when you doubt that it is FP, but in the same way you find it quite good. Probably minimum standards are passed. -- Pofka (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good QI of this church. -- Colin (talk) 19:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice composition and good perspective control but the colours and the quality are not reaching the FP standards, imho. --Laitche (talk) 08:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Yes, I think this is more of a QI than FP. There's nothing wrong with a simple composition like this but it needs something extra (nice light, lots of detail, etc) for it to reach FP for me. Diliff (talk) 12:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Diliff Poco² 19:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 08:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings