Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14-37-12-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg

File:14-37-12-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2010 at 17:38:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:14-37-12-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14-37-12-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg

•  Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Was the light really that yellowish? Looks like a wrong white balance. Same for the picture below. The quality is great, so please tell me if I'm wrong. -- Any1s (talk) 19:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • It's the same white balance. The paint on the wall is different. --ComputerHotline (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - too claustrophobic to be attractive - MPF (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very weird room, but that, I think, adds to its appeal, might be nicer if it were lightened. --IdLoveOne (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Perhaps QI, but for me not FP, cut of the table and..., too yellow--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Jebulon (talk) 16:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose why? its a normal motiv without any impressive parts, and there is no article using it Bunnyfrosch (talk) 14:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)