Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:02.Trinidad (59).JPG

File:02.Trinidad (59).JPG, featured

Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2009 at 15:16:07

•  Info created and uploaded by Elemaki - nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 15:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support It is a FP in Spanish Wikipedia. -- Kadellar (talk) 15:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC).. Neutral On the 2nd sight I think it's a nice picture but not perfect enough --Richard Bartz (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --Kosiarz-PL 16:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 15:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not very sharp, noise and oversaturated --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Not perfect ("Not very sharp, noise and oversaturated" - Massimo Catarinella), but I like it. —kallerna™ 18:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 04:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX^talk  20:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Technical issues aside, for me this photo has the wow required. Crumbling houses, old US cars, grass through the cobblestones, empty street - tells a whole story about Cuba - Peripitus (talk) 02:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 21:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Per Peripitus. The images makes you feel as if you're going back in time. Bidgee (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Over-exposure in some areas (see clouds and light that bounces off the green car) and low exposure in some shades (see bottom of the green car), saturated. I fail to observe interesting elements or representative who can tell me that this is Cuba, in addition to old cars and houses high Colonial could have found almost the entire Caribbean. Perhaps the author seeks to reflect the deterioration is not clear about the purpose of photography, but definitely lacks the human factor, there is a human element in the composition (a street that only serves as a parking lot but no one lives there). I can not watch something really interesting in this composition for qualifying but I do not oppose it. --libertad0 ॐ (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Ö 12:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)