Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Фотография интерьера.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2016 at 11:29:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Maltsev Manor in Balakovo, Russia
No comment on technical issues (I'm not the author and I cannot produce 360° panos myself), but "no valid category" is a lie. --A.Savin 12:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kindergarten, Alexander? --Hubertl 12:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Antworte doch besser, ob deine Behauptung ungültiger Kategorien nicht tatsächlich frei erfunden ist. Aber du kannst ja eh nur Dummgelaber... --A.Savin 13:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've re-added that part of my description. There's a template for it below the info template, but perhaps the description indication is more noticeable and helpful for viewers. INeverCry 23:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Ikan Kekek + @INeverCry - now I have to admit that I didn't know that there has been own category for this building since 2013. Nice to have constructive suggestions in this nom, not only stupid personal attacks. --A.Savin 23:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to be helpful, and Merry Christmas, if you're celebrating. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This is one of very rare cases I simply don't get such an oppose orgy. Did anyone of you look at the picture via 360° panoramic viewer? If not, so it is not surprising; when viewed simply as 100% zoom of the original file, strong distortions and unsharpnesses at the edges are the result. It is probably normal for a true 360° pano. But when viewed via the pano viewer, the detail is actually excellent in any place. OK, there are some strong highlights and flares on windows, but it's all not that dramatic (the patterns of the curtains are still visible), and what do you actually expect? A 360° HDR pano? ;-) And there is no dramatic (over-)saturation or CA visible. Many other FPC with similar or worse issues are being rubber-stamped here, and these are often simple shots; no panos and let alone no 360° ones! --A.Savin 11:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't vote here anymore, but I just saw the image in preview and thought that it is a shame that the processing is bad. The core problem to me is not clipping (where good HDR helps), but rather a excessive use of clarity, blacks and/or contrast that makes the image look entirely unrealistic. Getting the look right for an interior is much harder than for an exterior, but here the edges and structures are overemphasized. I guess that the image could be better if reprocessed more neutrally, but I don't know if the uploader is active. --DXR (talk) 12:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Come on, it would take less than an hour of postprocessing to make this one FP. I don't expect every 360° panorama to be like this (yes, a 360° HDR pano), but we should at least expect it to meet QI requirements which is not the case here. --Code (talk) 21:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't mind the projection used (and the consequent distortion) for the 360 degree panorama, but my main gripe is with the local constrast, i.e. "clarity" slider being dragged to an extreme. It's as if someone passed this through a high pass filter. dllu (t,c) 00:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Фотография_интерьера.jpg&oldid=183055042"