Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ακαδημία Αθηνών 1178.jpg

File:Ακαδημία Αθηνών 1178.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2019 at 20:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ακαδημία Αθηνών 1178.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ακαδημία Αθηνών 1178.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Greece
•  Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
• The Academy of Athens, seen at blue hour. The prunned trees allow the statues of Plato and Socrates to be seen along with the facade.  Support -- C messier (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Majestic! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice mood, but are the people at stairs inevitable or intention? Also, the sky needs cleanup, there are several dead pixels. --A.Savin 20:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • They provide scale, and IMHO, not disturbing as they don't ghost or hide parts of the building. --C messier (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
    • Anyway the sky isn't optimal and needs better process, if you wish I could see what I can do with your RAW file --A.Savin 21:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
    • @A.Savin and ArionEstar: New version. Most of the hot pixels are actually stars. --C messier (talk) 21:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
      • The people do not bother me, I think they just work as a scale. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 22:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
      •  Comment NR has now gone too far IMO. --A.Savin 22:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose the people. Charles (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose These people are clearly not a nice feature. It would have been better to wait for them to leave -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The people are not needed. --BoothSift 05:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Now--BoothSift 05:34, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
• @C messier, Charlesjsharp, Basile Morin, and Boothsift: I've removed the people, please check again. If you find too much traces of the removal or you don't like it, please revert. It was just a personal challenge for me if it was feasible or not to remove them. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Basotxerri IMHO, you should upload it as an alternative. --C messier (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
    • Yes, I agree. --BoothSift 16:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
    • I agree too, but can I express my intention to  Support only the version of the image with the people removed? And well done to Basotxerri for doing such a good job with that. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry, currently I haven't got the time for putting it as an alternative. But please do so, if you want. --Basotxerri (talk) 09:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment removing the people is not the way to FP. I believe FP should reward photographic skill, not post-processing skill. It would just take a little patience to take a photo without blurred people in it. 21:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  • When this pair decided to leave frame (after 10 minutes), came another pair...--C messier (talk) 04:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose A beautiful idea but too unsharp at the edges. Daniel Case (talk) 14:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I do not care whether those couples are removed or not, FP for me -- 🇪🅰〒©🇭🅰- 💬 19:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)