Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ötlingen - Panoramaansicht klein.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ötlingen - Panoramaansicht klein.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2011 at 15:33:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 15:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 15:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Marmoulak (talk) 02:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support --alex.vonbun (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Per QI and no one seems to have discovered any stitching flaws, so hopefully I was right. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose High overexposure. Unfortunate perspective because of the bush in the bottom right corner.--Snaevar (talk) 00:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- where do you see high overexposure? curious greeetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- He's just using the histogram. The image has a lot of highlighting, but there's no clipping so there arguably is no overexposure, certainly none that the eye can see. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I am using the histogram. Most of it is in the forground, that is in the bush in the bottom right, in the flag next to it and the tree to the far right (all parts that show clearly visable overexposure). But, apart from the houses in the background in the center of the far left of the image and the sky there is overexposure everywhere.--Snaevar (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- I look at pictures with my eyes and not with the histrogramm an I can see everythink clearly. Also the sky has a visible painting with blue parts and clouds with different tonality. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with Wladyslaw. Also, the medium of photography is an art, which is to be evaluated with the eye to the actual picture, and not with the mathematical charting of the EXIF data histogram. The histogram cannot determine whether a picture is good or not. This picture appears well exposed to me. LeavXC (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support —stay (sic)! 06:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support --shizhao (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support - LeavXC (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support--Claus (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas