Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"Русский Музей", г.Санкт-Петербург.jpg

File:"Русский Музей", г.Санкт-Петербург.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2011 at 15:20:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Featured picture candidates/File:"Русский Музей", г.Санкт-Петербург.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"Русский Музей", г.Санкт-Петербург.jpg

•  Info created by Antonleto - uploaded by Antonleto - nominated by JukoFF JukoFF (talk) 23:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I also admired that picture, thanks for the nomination. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 10:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Celia Ascenso (talk) 11:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --MyCanon (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Cut-off subject, distracting background. Close to FPX, in my opinion. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Support FP for me. --Rave (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Alvesgaspar. --Jovian Eye _storm 10:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose If not random shot, looks much like so. Featuring this (and thus putting this at same level as others FP) would ruin the many efforts some people do here. - Benh (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment -- I endorse Benh's concern and ask the reviewers, especially the less experienced ones, to read carefully our technical guidelines before voting. This is not a popularity contest, we are supposed to choose here the very best Commons has to offer! I have noticed that some of those users never opposed a nomination. If everybody acted that way, the forum would loose its credibility and the FP star wouldn't mean anything. Also, and according to my own experience in FPC, we learn much more from the opposes (when justified) than from the supports. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
    •  Comment Correct remark. However, in addition to the basic requirements spelled images in the rules, there are aesthetic evaluation, and from my point of view, it is also important for the project. We choose what is done with high quality and beautifully done, what pleases the eye. Sorry for the bad English. JukoFF (talk) 23:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
      • The problem here is that it is not beautifully done. The framing and point of view are not the best and image quality is very poor. Please open the file in full size and notice the chromatic noise and lack of detail. Looking only at the thumbnail is not enough for a carefull evaluation. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose  ■ MMXX  ^talk 00:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)