Category talk:Checker vehicles

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Right now it looks like this:

A
Checker automobiles‎ (4 C)
► Checker Marathon‎ (3 C)
► Checker Aerobus‎ (1 C)
► Checker Medicar‎ (1 F)

(and Limousines and Superbas and Specials when and if we find images for them)

B
Checker buses‎ (1 C)
► Checker Transit Buses‎ (3 F)
C
Commonwealth Motors Corporation vehicles‎ (1 F)
T
Checker taxis‎ (7 C)
► Checker Model A4‎ (4 F)
► Checker Model A8‎ (10 F)
► Checker Model A9‎ (4 F)
► Checker Model A11‎ (72 F)
► Checker Model H‎ (4 F)
► Checker Model T‎ (5 F)
► Checker Model Y‎ (1 F)

(and more models when photos found)

Problems of missing images of earlier taxis including a lack of images of A8 Specials and A10 Superbas and Marathons and limousines (not Aerobuses). I'm not sure why we have Commonwealth Motors Corporation vehicles.

I note that A11 seems to be the coding for all commercial vehicles.

Thoughts, please. Eddaido (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All I know is I saw too many Checker categories organized in some weird way. And did they really spell "Stationwagon" as one word? ----DanTD (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"organized in some weird way" do you still have that problem? I'd also like to hear if you are happy with the current arrangement. Otherwise my response is rome . . . day if you see what I mean. One of the crosses I must bear is I am not a native American English speaker or should that be english? When I look through the brochures the words are indeed separated. They have no gap between them in the index to the brochures. No gap then one less key stroke and I'm lazy, sometimes more than others. So you're a fresh young New York State man who has visited Canada what should they be? station wagons or just wagons? Checker brochures use the two words though so far as I'm concerned we are talking of a type of vehicle rather than the Checker name for the vehicles —and there I might be wrong. So 1. wagons or station wagons? and 2. is the current structure OK? Eddaido (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]