User talk:Syced

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Syced!

John Vandenberg (chat) 08:40, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep section "Please help monitor this page" permanently at the top[edit]

Hi Syced, do you see a possibility to keep the section Please help monitor this page permanently on top?

By the way: Thank you very much for your work and your commitment to the Commons App. For me, the Commons App is a very important tool that I really like!
Best regards

Molgreen (talk) 10:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The app writes to the top of the page, but we could modify the behavior of the app to always leave line transclusion template at the top. Would you mind creating a GitHub issue about this? Thanks a lot! And if you are able to post recent issues to GitHub (preferably after verifying that not such issue exists already or has been fixed recently, that would be a great help! :-) Syced (talk) 10:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Molgreen (talk) 12:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, I came her for a question after Molgreen had asked my, so I simply add it here (keeping the monitor the page section on top would have something I’ve suggested, as well - another suggestion would be archiving or even deleting obsolete sections, but on the other hand it has its won talk page).
Syced, I have noticed something with the wiki source created by the Commons App that annoys me. Is it ok to add an issue in the GitHub resource without being an app user and so without being able to go into details? Molgreen have asked me doing this, but I am hesitating. — Speravir23:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, it is perfectly OK. 🙂 Just give a few examples of what the app writes, what you think it should write, and why it is better, if possible with a link to the relevant policy/guideline. Thanks a lot for the feedback! Syced (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, here we go: Change line break behaviour of description template · Issue #5523 · commons-app/apps-android-commons. — Speravir23:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :-) Syced (talk) 01:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding my former uttering “another suggestion would be archiving or even deleting obsolete sections, but on the other hand it has its own talk page” (fixed the spelling mistake) I would be happy about a reaction in Commons talk:Mobile app/Feedback#Archive resolved sections. — Speravir23:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Ping) I am still interested in an answer. — Speravir01:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning @Syced, could you say when you expect to have the opportunity to deal with the matter or could @Speravir implement it as he sees fit? Best regards. Molgreen (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could it be that your wiki notification system is not working? Molgreen (talk) 05:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 08:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 08:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 09:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 09:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:September 2007, Strasbourg sightseeing 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahakaryain1 (talk) 09:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

画像処理させて頂きました[edit]

こんにちは、Sycedさん。いつも画像をアップロードして頂きどうも有難うございます。さて File:堀ノ内斎場.jpg につきまして、個人情報をモザイク処理してアップロードさせて頂きましたのでご報告いたします。事後ではありますが、何卒ご了承下さいますようお願い申し上げます。Sycedさんの撮影された写真には興味深いものがいくつもあり、最近アップロードされた File:Horse transport long vehicle.jpg もその一つです。私は競走馬輸送車を見たことがありませんので関心をもって拝見いたしました。いつも有難うございます。--Krorokeroro (talk) 08:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

堀ノ内斎場に関して、確かに!ありがとうございます、気付いてなかったです。Commonsアプリの「近い文書」機能で出てきましたので撮影しました。ありがとうございます! :-) Syced (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:District 1 Saigon 47.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Streets and buildings in district 1 Saigon 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saigon seen from bus 53 in evening rain 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lotte Hotel Saigon (20230705 1515).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:District 1 Saigon 63.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]